First a clarification: by SLM we mean any process whereby, with a focused beam of energy (light, electrons) metal powder gets locally melted (not sintered), after which a new layer of metal powder is applied. The melting, not sintering, of the powder is what makes supports necessary.
In SLM, like in SLS, machine time is the total of two parts of a cycle: scanning by the energy beam, the duration of which depends on the scanning area of the slice at that moment being scanned, and wiping new powder on, which is more or less constant. This is reflected in the way the first set of parameters is set up:
The nominal growth rate, along the z-axis, correlating to the wiper speed and the layer thickness.
The nominal melting rate, correlating to the power of the energy beam (how fast it can melt any given slice).
The nominal layer thickness: the layer thickness your manufacturer recommends or which you are most comfortable with.
The price per hour: We assume you have calculated a price per hour for the machine in question which allows you to write off the machine before it becomes obsolete (2-5 years). We would assume that this is somerwhere around 60-100$/hour, but that does not take into account the fact that usually you will print multiple models in one batch.
This is where the wiper cycle comes into play: It will always be an n number of seconds, multiplied by (model height/layer thickness), independent of the volume or weight of the model. This is why it is recommended to load the built envelope to the max, because a 9% loaded machine will not print 10 times as fast as a 90% loaded machine, but only 2 to 3 times.
We recommend to start the price per hour per model at 1/10 of the price per hour for the machine, and tweak it after a month.
In any case, this part of the template works as follows: Let's say you've added a material called Titanium for SLM, and you have selected two possible layer thicknesses:
One is the nominal layer thickness for this machine, 75 micrometers, the other one is even finer, 20 micrometers. For simplicity's sake we assume that printing at 20 micrometer layer thickness will be 75/20 (3,75) times as slow as when printing at the nominal.
Now 3 calculation for 1 model are possible:
-volume of the model/nominal melting rate per hour;
-height of the model/growth rate per hour @ nominal layer thickness (75 micrometer)
-height of the model/growth rate per hour @ high resolution layer thickness (20 micrometer)
All three calculations will result in a number of hours. For both layer thicknesses the results are compared to the result of the (volume/nominal melting rate per hour). In both comparisons the highest number of hours will be selected and multiplied by the hourly rate:
IF volume of the model/divided nominal melting rate per hour > height of the model/growth rate per hour
=>volume of the model/divided nominal melting rate per hour;
ELSE =>height of the model/growth rate per hour.
The result of the comparison will be multiplied by the rate per hour.
Very important: You can use any and all of the other pricing parameters in combination with this one, the results of each type of calculation will simply be added to the sum total of the model production costs.